MCP Gateway DatasheetSelection guide · Rev 2026-11-03

Best self-hosted and open source MCP gateway

Reweighted for self-hosted and open source · weights under each criterion · Rev 2026-11-03
RankGatewayTotalG1
10
G2
10
G3
5
G4
10
G5
10
G6
15
G7
40
DeploymentPrice as published
1Aembit8.20810248109Self-hosted VMFree tier; $20/agent/mo
2=Obot6.705528649Open source, self-hostedFree (MIT)
2=agentgateway6.656424579Open source, self-hostedFree (Apache 2.0)
2=ContextForge6.655527559Open source, self-hostedFree (Apache 2.0)
5NewCore6.551010108954SaaSNo list price
6Docker6.353627359Open source, localFree (MIT)
7=Microsoft6.205426568Open source or AzureFree (MIT) or Azure
7=Silverfort6.209597955SaaSQuote
9=Idira5.608926764Platform add-onAdd-on, no price
9=TrueFoundry5.556427656SaaSFree start
11Kong5.356726774Self-managed or KonnectNot found
12=Cloudflare4.907525664SaaSNot found
12=Lasso4.902323528Open source, localFree (MIT)
12=Mintive4.907838833SaaSDemo

In short: Aembit leads for self-hosted and open source with a weighted score of 8.20, ahead of Obot at 6.70 and agentgateway at 6.65. This view reuses the selection table scores with its own weights, putting 40 percent on deployment. The full ranking is below.

Why these weights?

Deployment carries 40 percent here, so open source licences and free self-hosting dominate. Standards carry 15 percent because self-hosters wire up their own authorization servers.

CriterionThis viewMain table
G1 Identity-bound per-call authorization1025
G2 Credential brokering1020
G3 Human approval and escalation515
G4 Server registry and discovery1010
G5 Audit evidence1010
G6 Standards1510
G7 Deployment and buying clarity4010

The criterion scores are the same as on the selection table. Only the weights change. Other views are listed on the pick by need index.

By The Datasheet desk · Published and reviewed 2026-11-03