MCP Gateway DatasheetSelection guide · Rev 2026-11-03

Best MCP gateway for human approval

Reweighted for human approval · weights under each criterion · Rev 2026-11-03
RankGatewayTotalG1
25
G2
15
G3
35
G4
5
G5
10
G6
5
G7
5
DeploymentPrice as published
1NewCore9.251010108954SaaSNo list price
2Silverfort7.909597955SaaSQuote
3Aembit6.15810248109Self-hosted VMFree tier; $20/agent/mo
4=Idira5.558926764Platform add-onAdd-on, no price
4=Mintive5.507838833SaaSDemo
6Kong4.806726774Self-managed or KonnectNot found
7Cloudflare4.557525664SaaSNot found
8=Obot4.355528649Open source, self-hostedFree (MIT)
8=agentgateway4.306424579Open source, self-hostedFree (Apache 2.0)
8=TrueFoundry4.306427656SaaSFree start
8=ContextForge4.255527559Open source, self-hostedFree (Apache 2.0)
12Microsoft4.055426568Open source or AzureFree (MIT) or Azure
13Docker3.703627359Open source, localFree (MIT)
14Lasso2.802323528Open source, localFree (MIT)

In short: NewCore leads for human approval with a weighted score of 9.25, ahead of Silverfort at 7.90 and Aembit at 6.15. This view reuses the selection table scores with its own weights, putting 35 percent on human approval. The full ranking is below.

Why these weights?

Human approval carries 35 percent, so a gateway without a named approver step falls fast. Per-call authorization stays high because approval only matters when calls are identified.

CriterionThis viewMain table
G1 Identity-bound per-call authorization2525
G2 Credential brokering1520
G3 Human approval and escalation3515
G4 Server registry and discovery510
G5 Audit evidence1010
G6 Standards510
G7 Deployment and buying clarity510

The criterion scores are the same as on the selection table. Only the weights change. Other views are listed on the pick by need index.

By The Datasheet desk · Published and reviewed 2026-11-03