MCP Gateway DatasheetSelection guide · Rev 2026-11-03

Aembit vs Silverfort

Criterion diff · Rev 2026-11-03
CriterionAembitSilverfortAembit reasonSilverfort reason
G1 Identity-bound per-call authorization (25)89The gateway validates tokens and enforces policy on every MCP request, and Blended Identity evaluates agent and human together. [ae-home][ae-ga]Every tool call hits the gateway first, and sessions are correlated to a person through your identity provider. [sf-ai][sf-launch]
G2 Credential brokering (20)105It exchanges credentials on the agent's behalf so the agent never holds direct credentials. [ae-home]It removes standing privileges for agents using static API keys, but credential brokering is not described. [sf-ai]
G3 Human approval and escalation (15)29No human approval step was found on the pages read. [ae-home][ae-ga]The verdict on a call can be approve, block or step up to a human. [sf-ai]
G4 Server registry and discovery (10)47MCP tool filtering is documented; automatic discovery of unregistered servers was not found. [ae-home]It discovers sanctioned and rogue agents across identity providers, clouds and SaaS. [sf-ai][sf-launch]
G5 Audit evidence (10)89Every access event is logged, with SIEM export. [ae-home]An immutable audit trail ties each call to the initiating person. [sf-ai]
G6 Standards (10)105Names OAuth 2.1 per the MCP spec, OIDC, SAML, SPIFFE and XAA/ID-JAG. [ae-home][ae-ga]MCP and OIDC are named; other MCP authorization standards were not found. [sf-ai]
G7 Deployment and buying clarity (10)95Customer-hosted gateway VM, a free Starter tier and a published $20 per agent per month plan. [ae-pricing]A SaaS gateway reached by redirect, with quote-based packages and no published price. [sf-ai][sf-pricing]
Total7.407.20Weighted sum divided by 100.

In short: Aembit totals 7.40 and Silverfort totals 7.20 on our weighted rubric, a gap of 0.20 points. Aembit is ahead on credential brokering, standards and deployment. Silverfort is ahead on per-call authorization, human approval, registry and audit. Choose by the criteria your agents depend on, then check deployment and pricing below.

Which one should I choose?

Aembit totals 7.40 against 7.20 for Silverfort. The largest weighted difference is on human approval. Silverfort is ahead on per-call authorization, human approval, registry and audit.

Pick Aembit if credential brokering matters most to you.

It scores 10 against 5 there: it exchanges credentials on the agent's behalf so the agent never holds direct credentials.

Pick Silverfort if human approval matters most to you.

It scores 9 against 2 there: the verdict on a call can be approve, block or step up to a human.

How do deployment and pricing compare?

ParameterAembitSilverfort
DeploymentCustomer-hosted gateway VM with a managed MCP Authorization Server.SaaS gateway tenant; MCP clients are redirected to it.
Price as publishedFree Starter tier; AI Teams at $20 per agent per month for 10 to 500 agents; Enterprise by contact.Quote-based packages; no published price.
Identity providerYes. Aembit names OIDC, SAML and XAA/ID-JAG, so it federates with an existing identity provider.Yes. Silverfort correlates agent sessions to a person through your identity provider.

Full datasheets: Aembit MCP Identity Gateway and Silverfort MCP Gateway.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Aembit or Silverfort?
On our rubric Aembit totals 7.40 against 7.20 for Silverfort. The better choice depends on which criteria matter most to you.
Do Aembit and Silverfort work with my identity provider?
Aembit: Yes. Aembit names OIDC, SAML and XAA/ID-JAG, so it federates with an existing identity provider. Silverfort: Yes. Silverfort correlates agent sessions to a person through your identity provider.
How do Aembit and Silverfort differ on price?
Aembit: Free Starter tier; AI Teams at $20 per agent per month for 10 to 500 agents; Enterprise by contact. Silverfort: Quote-based packages; no published price.

By The Datasheet desk · Published and reviewed 2026-11-03